Ślad:

Różnice

Różnice między wybraną wersją a wersją aktualną.

Odnośnik do tego porównania

Poprzednia rewizja po obu stronachPoprzednia wersja
Nowa wersja		Poprzednia wersja
conferences:agent_based_models_of_language_emergence [2021/11/05 17:49] – abstract zubekjconferences:agent_based_models_of_language_emergence [2021/11/23 22:47] (aktualna) – edycja zewnętrzna 127.0.0.1
Linia 7: Linia 7:
 Last 10 years have seen a proliferation of computational models of language emergence (Lazaridou & Baroni, 2020). Despite their variety (in concerns and architectures) they still seem to cling to several key assumptions about the communication process. We try to identify those among the assumptions which may hinder progress and point to possible ways to substitute them with less-limiting ones. We discuss three key issues. Last 10 years have seen a proliferation of computational models of language emergence (Lazaridou & Baroni, 2020). Despite their variety (in concerns and architectures) they still seem to cling to several key assumptions about the communication process. We try to identify those among the assumptions which may hinder progress and point to possible ways to substitute them with less-limiting ones. We discuss three key issues.
  
-First, in the existing models environments tend to be extremely simplified,  +First, in the existing models environments tend to be extremely simplified, often reduced to a set of static stimuli presented to a passive agent. Agent’s actions are limited to choosing the target stimulus from the set of distractors. There is no structure of agent’s actions which could guide the structure of emerging communication.
-often reduced to a set of static stimuli presented to a passive agent. Agent’s  +
-actions are limited to choosing the target stimulus from the set of distractors.  +
-There is no structure of agent’s actions which could guide the structure of  +
-emerging communication.+
  
-Second, the function of communication is often limited to describing the  +Second, the function of communication is often limited to describing the properties of the environment. The communication is unidirectional: there are distinguished roles of speaker and listener. What is missing is the interactivity: there is no recognition that interaction itself is a meaning-making process (De Jaegher & Di Paolo, 2007). Communication can be about (regulating) the  interaction, rather than about prespecified “meanings”.
-properties of the environment. The communication is unidirectional: there are  +
-distinguished roles of speaker and listener. What is missing is the interactivi- +
-ty: there is no recognition that interaction itself is a meaning-making process  +
-(De Jaegher & Di Paolo, 2007). Communication can be about (regulating) the  interaction, rather than about prespecified “meanings”.+
  
 Third, signals are often cast as amodal, discrete symbols devoid of any physical properties. Signals are not a part of the environment in a meaningful way. Existence of discrete symbols with replicable form is presupposed rather than explained (Rączaszek-Leonardi, 2012). Such symbols can be composed in an arbitrary manner and assigned meanings equally arbitrary. There are no external constraints to guide their interpretation Third, signals are often cast as amodal, discrete symbols devoid of any physical properties. Signals are not a part of the environment in a meaningful way. Existence of discrete symbols with replicable form is presupposed rather than explained (Rączaszek-Leonardi, 2012). Such symbols can be composed in an arbitrary manner and assigned meanings equally arbitrary. There are no external constraints to guide their interpretation
Linia 25: Linia 17:
 **Literature** **Literature**
  
-Lazaridou, A., & Baroni, M. (2020). Emergent Multi-Agent Communication in the Deep Learning Era.  +  * Lazaridou, A., & Baroni, M. (2020). Emergent Multi-Agent Communication in the Deep Learning Era. ArXiv:2006.02419 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.02419 
-ArXiv:2006.02419 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.02419 +  * De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9 
-De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making. Phenomenology and the Cognitive  +  * Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2012). Language as a System of Replicable Constraints. In H. H. Pattee & J. Rączaszek-Leonardi, LAWS, LANGUAGE and LIFE (Vol. 7, pp. 295–333). Springer Netherlands.
-Sciences, 6(4), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9 +
-Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2012). Language as a System of Replicable Constraints. In H. H. Pattee & J.  +
-Rączaszek-Leonardi, LAWS, LANGUAGE and LIFE (Vol. 7, pp. 295–333). Springer Netherlands.+
  
 --- ---